Showing posts with label Decision 2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Decision 2012. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Ack!!

http://gaw.kr/KEydx4


Romney Won’t Speak to Donald Trump’s Assertion That Obama Was Born in Kenya.


Asked Monday to weigh in on Trump’s support for the so-called birther movement, Romney declined to condemn Trump’s latest suggestion that Obama was born in Kenya.
“I don’t agree with all the people who support me. And my guess is they don’t all agree with everything I believe in,” Romney told reporters before flying from California to Colorado Monday evening. “But I need to get 50.1 percent or more. And I’m appreciative to have the help of a lot of good people.”

{Break}

Is it possible that Mr Magic Underwear Man could get any sleazier?  We have all the way to November to find out.

Sweet Baby Jesus On A Pogo Stick, that is going to be an eternity.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Joe Biden’s Gay Old Time.

What a mixed blessing Joe Biden is to Team Obama. The man has some serious foreign policy chops, especially when it comes to the Graveyard of Empires. Biden’s small bore, laser-focused, strategy of taken out Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden is the only reason we may finally exit Afghanistan anytime soon. By turning OBL into shark chum, a kind of victory can be claimed, and a dignified departure made. But with all the gravitas off shore the VP can sometimes be rather “colorful” domestically. Biden can be quite the loose cannon.

I’m wondering how that loose cannon, and the friendly fire it provided, finally changed the environment around Barack Obama. The shell that Joe fired into Obama’s tent a few  days ago was nice bit of Darwinian natural selection; forcing the final “evolution” of Barack on Same Sex Marriage.

That was some hole the VP blasted in the lines gentle reader. Goodness, it was painful to watch Team Obama scurry around and attempt to reform the old position on Gay Marriage. Troops scurried hither and thither, battle flags were waved, much screaming and shouting occurred, and the Press Secretary got shredded by incoming shrapnel.

But the damage was done, Joe Biden’s off the cuff remarks left little wiggle room and no real walk back. Seriously gentle reader, if there was a way to walk back the VP’s statement, Barack Obama would have found it.  Instead, what was offer for two news cycles was the undignified flop, twitch, flail and fail of Team Obama’s messaging.

The final push from the VP was actually a blessing in disguise. Few things in politics are  truly inevitable, but some times the tectonic shifts in political landscape make some positions totally untenable. The Obama fudge, the safe harbor of Civil Unions, is gone. A huge shift in national attitudes has made that middle ground a tiny spit of land. The majority of US citizens have come to accept Gay Marriage; political break point has been achieved.

North Carolina not withstanding, over fifty percent of US citizens now support same sex marriage. They do so because a grand bargain has been struck. Both philosophical liberals and philosophical conservatives have strong reasons to support the proposition. For liberals it is all about supporting human rights and human liberation. For Conservatives it is all about the stability marriage offers. For those Homosexuals that have bought into the institution of marriage, the whole romantic love leading to a house, to children, and to a minivan (or SUV), the doors have been open.

This not to say all doors are open, or that a minority dose not want those doors shut and barred; nothing of the sort. North Carolina proved that reaction is still alive and well. In a primary election the evangelical vote can still get its gay bashing on. The muddled middle of the voting population has not quite signed on to the idea of every gay person being able to marry, just the ones they know. It is still far too easy to buffalo so called “moderate voters” into supporting really reactionary and really toxic legislation, especially in low turn out elections.

Still we, as a nation, have turned yet another corner. The President of the United States has made a stand. As the leader of one of the major two parties, this sets a new bar. It will be very hard for the Donkeys to walk away from this one;  it will be near impossible for them to play coy. A battle flag has been planted, a territory marked out, politicians that run as Democrats must either man the barricades, or go over to the other side; no middle ground now exists.

For all of that, I still wonder if Obama really wanted to play the part of Happy Warrior for Marriage Equality. Forgive me for being churlish, but I am not about to thank him for taking three years and change to finally come to Jesus as it were.

Thanking Obama for finally coming around to this stand is a lot like expecting a recently  abused wife to be happy when her her husband remembers to give her flowers on her anniversary. Should that wife really be forced to smile only day after he ne'er do well husband gave her a black eye?

I admit to being down on Barack. His leadership, or more to the point his lack of leadership, on the economy has been appalling. The subservience Obama has shown to the Wall Street crowd has been nauseating to behold. It has also been amazingly counterproductive. The one bit of distemper that Obama the Wall Street lap dog showed was enough for The Street to abandon him for the shining Mitt on the hill.

Couple that with his continuing of the Bushite assault on basic civil liberties and it has been a very bleak three years for those of us who take out basic constitutional rights seriously. Trading off the protections of the fourth, fifth and sixth amendments for Marriage Equality seems to me be a bad deal. Please don’t get me started on that meme, because I have more than few things to say on that line and on Obama’s abject failure to support the basic rights of women. Gays can marry but women will be stripped of the right to control their own bodies? Tell me how that is rational trade off. Same sex couples can marry, but their homes and effects can be subject to no-knock or sneak and peek warrants, this is “progress”?

It is a good thing that Obama has finally made a choice to fish or cut bait, I will grant that. It is a good thing that Joe Biden’s ever flapping lips provided the final push for that decision. Still, it is really is not up to Obama, or the Executive, to provide the final answer.

The Supremes are going to provide the last word, for good or ill, for at least a generation. With only a smattering of states sanctioning Marriage Equality, and over half of them blocking it outright, it will be the nine who sort the mess out. You can not have a marriage that is created in Massachusetts being made null and void in when the couple moves to Texas; that way lies madness. The Constitution is fairly clear on the matter in Article IV Section 1, which is why the homophobes keep yammering about an amendment so they can keep the gay-bashing going.

Forgive me gentle reader, but I’ll wait for how the Supremes to weigh in before I put on my party hat. I will also wait to see how deep, dark, and dirty Team Obama goes into this newly “evolved” state before I give any kudos for that new stance. Is this something that Obama and company will shout to the rooftops from now until November, or was this something that Barack and his political team did to bury a distraction? News cycles are news cycles gentle reader, and the recent move by the President definitely spiked a controversy that had some serious legs.

Personally, I do hope that Barack H. Obama comes out large and in charge on Marriage Equality; he might as well because the Republicans are going to try to beat him from pillar to post on the issue. Obama would be wondrous wise if he came out swinging and kept right on swinging until November. Follow Uncle Joe Biden here Mr. President; once more, Uncle Joe knows best.

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Santorum rolls over competition in Louisiana primary

 McClatchy: "Rick Santorum won handily in Louisiana's Republican presidential primary Saturday, solidfying his position as Mitt Romney's last credible challenger as the campaign heads into states that will test whether Santorum can broaden his appeal to less conservative voters.

The former Pennsylvania senator had been expected to win, but campaigned heavily in this Deep South state, seeking to widen his margin over Romney and reinforce his message that he is a trustworthy conservative while Romney is a politician with erasable Etch-A-Sketch views.

"

'via Blog this'

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Feel The Excitement.

The day after Mitt Romney's win in Illinois, former Massachusetts Gov. Jeb Bush is endorsing him and calling for the party to unite around the former Massachusetts governor who has struggled to close the deal.

"Primary elections have been held in thirty-four states, and now is the time for Republicans to unite behind Governor Romney and take our message of fiscal conservatism and job creation to all voters this fall," Bush said in an e-mail sent out by his education foundation. "I am endorsing Mitt Romney for our Party's nomination. We face huge challenges, and we need a leader who understands the economy, recognizes more government regulation is not the answer, believes in entrepreneurial capitalism and works to ensure that all Americans have the opportunity to succeed."

Many Republicans unhappy with Romney had held out hopes that Bush would get into the race, despite his protests to the contrary.

 http://blogs.mcclatchydc.com/washington/2012/03/jeb-bush-endorses-mitt-romney-says-its-time-for-gop-to-unite.html

Read more here: http://blogs.mcclatchydc.com/washington/2012/03/jeb-bush-endorses-mitt-romney-says-its-time-for-gop-to-unite.html#storylink=cpy

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

The Wait Is Nearly Over

This is it, the day that Arizona and Michigan have their primaries. This is the only poll that matters. From the tea leaves of the polls it looks to be a nail-biter. I can tell you one thing, if Mitt goes down in Michigan it will because of his latest bit of foot-in-mouth disease. The NASCAR quote brings in stark relief what a out of touch swell Willard Romney is.

It has been really weird following the Mittsters messaging in MI. He spent many years living in the state. His dad was an institution working for an institution. But Mitt's exclusive, elite upbringing in Michigan has made him an alien in his home state. The truly bizarre Romney ramblings, love those tree, and the whole Mormon thing have to be off-putting to an electorate that is deeply working class, and more deeply rooted in the soil than Romney is.

The run up today has been typical for Elephant electioneering as practiced in 2012; down and dirty. It's been a mud fest with both candidates carpet bombing the air-waves with negative ads. Mitt has the advantage in the shear volume of negative ads, outspending Rick 3 to 1; but is it enough? Santorum's blue-collar cred and his cultural conservative are much more authentic than Romney's attempts to rub elbows with the hoi polloi. Plus has that momentum thing going for him.

In a way Santorum has already won. Romney is deeply damaged goods. That a man running for president for six years has to fight tooth and nail to win his home state, and by a narrow margin, speaks volumes about the fundamental weakness of Willard Romney. Even if Romney wins, it a political death march for him all the way to the convention. By the time Romney wraps the whole thing up, it may be a pointless venture; a Pyrrhic victory. Romney may be so lost in the far right field that he cannot sprint to the political middle, even with a rocket pack.

Yes the Elephants will put on quite a charge, they will bring out the faithful to eject that evil, Communist, Marxist, Socialist, Muslim, Radical Leftist, America Hating Obama but the Republicans are no more than 40% of the electorate when you figure in "Independents" who somehow always vote for the GOP. That leaves the other 40% who vote for Donkeys without fail, and the unwashed middle of up to 20% that will be scared witless by a Republican Party that has obviously gone over the edge. Instead of a nail-biter that everyone expects, the general could turn out to be an Elephant grave yard.

It is a little early for that gloom and doom scenario being anything other than the fondest wish of the DNC, but this election has proven to be a lot more volatile than anyone predicted. The economy is still in the hurt locker, and the natives are still very restless. We will see a snap shot of exactly how restless the natives are tonight.

Monday, February 27, 2012

Faith, Fundamentalism and The First Amendment

I have been away from this blog for more than a week. I’ve been sitting and waiting for the results of MI and AZ to wonder in like drunken sailors from a liberty port. The last few days have seen the polls stagger, careen, and career about like a very abstruse chaos theory calculation. The results may be close in Arizona and Michigan, or maybe not. Who knows? The primary season has lost all sense of narrative arc, degenerating into a tale that is all sound and fury. But, Sweet Baby Jesus On A Pogo Stick ,the shear idiocy and stark raving insanity of the Elephant tribe has been unnerving to watch.

Just when I think the Republicans could not dig a hole any deeper, they break out the heavy equipment to bore through the political bedrock. In pandering to the crazy, the Mighty Mormon and Mr. Unfortunate Google Result have attempted to take a wrecking ball to the separation of church and state.

It was no great surprise that Rick Santorum went all Theo-Con radical on the subject. That Santorum would make a totally inappropriate comment about JFK’s fifty year old statement on the subject of church-state separation seems by now par for course.

It would take another post to tease out how wrong Santorum's musings were. Let’s just say that his religious beliefs are in no way “oppressed” when others block his attempt to force his special brand of theocracy down their throats.  Let’s us also say he has is Constitutional understandings of the First Amendments at a ninety degree opposition to reality. I could continue on this vane, but I want to move on to more pressing matters. There is a lot to cover, and only so much time. Let’s move on, shall we?

One of those matters was the rotting corpse of the US Catholic Bishops doubling down on contraception, along with Daryl Issa. I’m way late to this particular party, please forgive me, I was just unable to recover from the jaw-dropping idiocy of the whole tempest in a tea pot.

Of all the “cultural” conflicts that the Elephants could attempt to gin up outrage on, they choose contraception? And they did it in such ham-fisted way that the proceedings outraged anyone with a vagina or a functioning male brain? (I know, I know, a “functioning male brain” is an oxymoron)  

Riddle me this, how do the Elephants intend to win any national election with only 30% of the female vote? Yes, vote for us, the party that wants to take your BC pills, IUDs, diaphragms, etc, away from you! Vote for the barefoot and pregnant party! Wow, that’s a sure-fire winner; why has no one come up with that before?

But it gets better, or worse depending on your point of view. In the latests bit of Republicans pointing out, “if you haven’t noticed, the President is a black man,” Mitt channeled his inner, soulless, pander-bear and made noise about Obama’s lack of a proper Christian faith. Run that by me again oh magic underwear man, you have questions about Obama’s Orthodoxy? You who tote around a extra-special “Additional Gospel of Jesus Christ” want to get into a discussion of The One True Faith?

Exactly when did a candidates Christology become a matter of political speculation? When did a grubby, face-shifting, flip-flopping, political hack gain the right to smear any other candidates’ faith? What part of “no” in the constitution’s no religious tests for office did the seagull worshiping Romney fail to understand?

Honestly, that bit of pander by Willard floored me. It was so skeevy, so typical, so calculated, this slandering of Obama’s faith. It was a transparent bit of flummery tossed to the evangelical, fundamentalist, born-agains. It was Mitt saying “hey I can be an utterly intolerant jackass. I can do this racist, dog-whistle, political gamesmanship just like Mr. Sweater-vest and the Icky Amphibian can. See, I’m a narrow-minded, exclusionary, bigoted, Christian-In-Name-Only, mouth-breather--just like you!” How low has the Mitt man fallen. In the six years Willard Romney has pursued the goal of the Republican nomination for president, he has lost the thread, he has definitely forgotten Matthew 16:26.

I’m not even going to bother attempting to offer a rejoinder to the talking point that Obama is a bad or fake Christian. I have no idea what the term “Christian” might mean.* Give me the common thread that joins Orthodox Christians worshiping in one of the great basilicas built in post Soviet Russia ,and the Appalachians handling snakes in some shot gun shack in the middle of nowhere; then we can talk. Tell me what the link is between the mass of Syriac Orthodox Church and glossolaic utterances (Speaking in Tongues) of  Pentecostals --in twenty five words or less-- and you will rate as a super-genius in my book. No points for saying “Jesus” or “the Holy Spirit”

(* I know there are plenty of helmet-haired freaks of nature more than willing to blabber on ad infinitum, and ad nauseum, about their pet theory of what Christian and Christianity entails: “give your heart to Jesus, and blather, blather, yammer, yammer, jaw, jaw, etc.” That is not Christian nor Christianity. That is a very narrow interpretation of what Christianity might be. It is the not the first interpretation, nor will it be the last. It is most certainly not the only interpretation.)

As one who has read far too much history for normal functioning, I can tell you nothing good comes out of a debate about who the, “proper Christian” might be. The same question recast as , “who is the proper Muslim” is also incredibly problematic; just ask the Shia and Sunnis about that little conundrum. This is why we in West decided to give the entire thing a miss, and went for secularism.

I can see why the entire notion of secularism frosts Santorum’s corn flakes. For a Theo-Con like Santorum, secularism is the barred and bolted door that prevents him from achieving his theocratic state. Secularism is the big fat fortified mountain that Rick must overcome before he can shove his heretical notions down the rest of the nation’s throat. Secularism is real freedom contrasted with Santorum’s freedom to run the land as autocrat and Pope.

Our system of secularism did  not spring up as some evil plot hatched by Christ-hating, evil Liberals in the 1960’s. It was set up by the bitter lessons of two centuries of civil-religious warfare. It is the results of the hard lessons learned in Continental Europe, then In Cromwellian England and then finally in the wretched excess of the Puritans in New England. The founders wanted no part of any established faith, they had a belly full of the Church Of England and wanted no repeats.

In one respect the yammering of the Republican hopefuls is spot on, this election is a defining choice. Not because the shape-shifting, transactional Obama may win or loose a second term; it is not about Obama. What it is about is the over-reach of radical TEA Party ultras. It is about the over-reach of Theo-cons and other radicals who want to remake the nation into a regressive fantasy of a US that never existed. It is an attempt to negate not only the liberations of the 1960’s but also every bit of racial, social, and gender justice carved out since the New Deal. And once that work is complete the reactionaries will shred both the New Deal and that Commie pinko TR’s Fair Deal so they can properly relive the glory days of the Gilded Age.

The right is freaking out about the twin liberations of women and blacks. They want their white patriarchy back and don’t who gets hurt in its restoration. They mau-mau the Constitution on the way to shredding it into a fine confetti. This concern tolling about “religious liberty” is nothing more than Orwellian doublespeak. It is not about liberty, its about oppression. It is the attempt of a small cadre of reactionary evangelicals imposing their notions, their will to power on the rest of us.

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

The Wheels Fall Off The Bus ... Again.

The results of the February 7th caucuses are in and it was rather grim night for Multiple Choice Mitt. Once again Romney’s position as front runner got dinged.

In any campaign three items are critical for success: funding, organization, and the candidate. Team Romney has no problem with funding nor with the organization; it’s the candidate that keeps falling short. Romney’s latest campaign effort in the caucuses of Missouri, Colorado, and Minnesota should have been a walk in the park; instead it was a mugging.

Every time Mittens looks to be building up some momentum, it seems he gets side-swiped. Newt Gingrich acted as a speed bump in South Carolina and now Rick Santorum has stalled Mitt in the latest caucuses. Romney keeps failing with the hard right evangelical voters. Granted, the nomination is still Willard’s to loose, but at times like this, it really does look like he is up to that challenge.

Remember that Santorum was on the wrong end of a eighteen point drubbing that last time he ran in a General. That filthy rich, super organized, Mitt got his head handed to him by such a weak challenger tells you volumes about how vulnerable Romney is. With only a shoestring operation, Santorum was able to strangle Team Romney in three states; not good, not good at all for the Mighty Mormon.

The latest unforced error by the Romney crew must have Establishment Republicans once again reaching for the Maalox. Having just carpet-bombed Newt Gingrich into a smoldering wreck via Super Pac slush funds, the powers that be must once again call in the heavies for a yet another run. This time it will be the sweater-vest wearing candidate with the unfortunate Google result that will be the target for the rolling thunder.

Romney has yet to win a state on his good graces alone. Every victory has been won by grinding his opponent into a fine powder via negative campaigning.  Romney is going to remind the next set of primary and caucus voters of every “interesting” and “offbeat” musing to ever escape the lips of Santorum. We are definitely revisit that whole zoophilia meme that Santorum indulged himself in only a few years back.

In the long run this cannot be good for Mitt, this scorched earth policy with his fellow Republicans. Romney’s negatives have climbed with his negative advertising. Romney was alway going to have a likeability deficit to overcome; he is a very off-putting man.

The preternaturally cold Romney always had problems connecting with the hoi-polloii who found him stiff and unauthentic. With all this bad Karma oozing out of the Republican primary effort, Mitt’s optics have shifted from merely cold, to cold and nasty. The more time Mitt spends clubbing his opponents into submission, the more he looks like one of those mean old Canadians brutalizing doe-eyed baby seals.

Mitt’s nastiness will also inoculate Team Obama against charges of over-the-top brutality. Team Obama will have a wide field to throw the odd elbow against the Mighty Mormon without the ref calling a foul. The 2012 general was always going to be a nasty affair, and Romney keeps on lowering the bar. Obama is going to go all Andrew Golota on Mitt (he has already green lighted Super Pacs to do the dirty deed) and Mitt has provided the cover for the tactic. Sauce for the gander dear reader.

I do wonder if a viable third party will step into this breech and provide a little sanity. I doubt it. Both Mitt and Obama are going to be able to shovel tons of cash into their efforts; how does a true independent counter that? How does that independent get the Corporate Media to pay attention to his or her campaign with Obama and Romney providing endless and pointless gossip for our juvenile journalist to wallow in? After all, that policy stuff is so deadly dull; give us scandal to boost the ratings!

Peel back the petty theatrics and the General still looks the same: two fundamentally weak and compromised candidates who talk past the very public that they are supposed to represent. The president is one of those fundamentally weak and compromised candidates. On the Republican side the choice appears to be the fundamentally weak Romney or the disastrously weak Gingrich or Santorum. This is the best a billion dollar campaign can achieve. That is the state of play; pretty damn pathetic, don’t you think?

Friday, February 3, 2012

The Trivialization Of Impeachment Long Form Edition

A very depressing thought came to me the other day; there is no way Barack Obama can win the 2012 election. What is depressing is not that Obama will loose the General Election, no, what is depressing is that there is no way Republicans will accept a Obama reelection. There is no way the Republican will not attempt to invalidate any result that has them loosing to the man they so irrationally hate. Two articles convince me that Republicans will attempt to nullify a Obama reelect by any and all means at their disposal. First it is the over-the-top and visceral hatred of Obama that the Republican base indulges itself in. When Republican primary voters start talking about a Obama reelect being a disaster that will result in a one thousand year dark age you know you have left the rational, facts base world and entered a parallel universe. You, or at least I, wonder if you can take these people seriously. Do these Republicans actually believe this hyperbole, and if not, why did they say such over-the-top nonsense to begin with? Obama is the most cool, almost cold, center-right politician ever to claim Democratic Party Pedigree in the modern era. He could be a younger Colin Powell, if Powell had gone to Harvard Law instead of West Point. The political DNA is almost exactly the same: moderate Republican, Beltway Establishment, no sharp edges to speak of. Yet Obama still manages to freak out core Republicans in ways that makes me scratch my head. The fire-breathing rhetoric about Obama does match the cool, no drama, politician who keeps marching to right to find a mythical middle ground with the Elephants. I’m not going to speculate about the specific phenomena of Obama Derangement syndrome, I’m going meta, and linking it to the Republican apoplectic response to the two terms of Bill Clinton. Ever since the face-plant of Jimmy Carter’s Administration and the twelve year run of Reagan-Bush that it brought about, the Republican Party has considered the office of President its exclusive purview by divine right.

Actually the Republican Party considers the entire Federal Government is patrimony until the end of time. Thus any Donkey ascendancy is by definition illegitimate. This is why Republicans bang on, and on, and on about voter fraud. They cannot accept the numbers when they lose. It does not match their assumption about their god-given right to rule the nation indefinitely as the only “real Americans.” As Republicans are the only “true” majority, any Democratic victory at the polls has to be obtained by massive fraud. Never mind that even in the Bush Administration it was impossible to find any actual voter fraud; it has to be true. The lack of evidence only proves how nefarious “Democrat” groups are in sneaking in their illegitimate, illegal, hoards into the voting booths. Which is why Grover Norquist can already plant the seed for an Impeachment move against Obama if the President can win a second term. “Obama can sit there and let all the tax [cuts] lapse, and then the Republicans will have enough votes in the Senate in 2014 to impeach.” Exactly how letting the Bush Tax scheme lapse rises to “High Crimes and Misdemeanors is never explained by Mr. Norquist. Not that Mr. Norquist seems bothered by the very thin logic of Impeaching Obama over tax policy. Mr. Norquist knows his base, and he knows how to set the table for them. The Impeachment of Barack Obama would be pure wingnut theater.

Using the template provided by Amanda Marcotte, I can see this all too clearly. An impeachment would fit the rabid right check list perfectly.

One, the charges would be utter garbage, total nonsense. Amanda is very clear that B.S. the most important component of any wingnut obsession. And as Norquist is 95% there already with the proposal to impeach over the Bush Tax Cuts, the last 5% is a walk in the park.  

Two, Pettiness. Almost self explanatory. An impeachment this time would not even have the thin veneer of sexual prudery to mask what is actually going on. No, it would be all pettiness, all the time for the Republicans attempting to impeach the president.

Three, selfishness. It is all about them, their candidate, their prerogatives, their tax cut, their America.

Four, Near-psychotic fear of change. Four more years of a dark-skinned, Democratic president is more than these folks can handle. Also, their delusion that they have a right to dictate to the rest of the nation how things will done will be further challenged. No one likes being told they don’t rule the roost any more, but wingnuts will be especially unhappy to find this out.

Five, Paranoia. Amanda links this to Pettiness, and who am I to argue with her? The template she offers is my secret wingnut decoder ring; and it has not failed me yet. Going after Obama because you think he might let a tax policy lapse, is irrational at the very least. You would have to be fairly paranoid to buy into Norquist world view about Obama, or to believe that Barack is on a par with the barbarian hoards the laid low Western Europe from the late 5th Century to the Age Of Discovery.

Six, Angering Liberals. This almost goes without saying. Yet another pointless impeachment, against a sitting Democratic President, for no good reason, would irritate the most mellow of live-and-let-live liberals. The African-American contingent of the liberal cohort would work themselves into a cold fury on the subject of Barack Obama’s impeachment. Who knows, even Obama might work himself up to saying a few discouraging words to Congressional Republicans. And that would be just fine with the wingnuts, because they live to get under their opponents skin. Much of what wingnuts do has the objective of angering, vexing, annoying, exasperating, pestering, and maddening liberals. It is like this is the only way they can get true validation. Red State is not enough, they have to check in with Daily Kos to make absolutely sure they are being perfect jackasses.

As stated in the beginning, I think that a Obama Impeachment is not merely “on the table” but a very live possibility; almost a sure-fire bet. It passes the wingnut challenge with flying colors It fits the pattern of the modern Republican Party and its rightward march. A 2014 impeachment would be perfect way to prime the pump for the post-Obama Republican assault on the White House. It would get the wingnut base energized and the Democrats wrong footed. The politics are perfect;  as long as victory is your only concern.

The second half of a presidential second term is the long, dark, night of the lame duck soul for the man occupying the office; he is a mere caretaker. Nothing is really going on in the fever swamps of D.C., so why not a little impeachment theater?

Who knows the Republicans may be bold enough to run on the fact that they will impeach if elected. It would be great stuff in the red meat, red state hinterlands; the gerrymandered single party enclaves, where only the most extreme survive. The partisan political logic of 2014 impeachment is near air-tight. Mind you, it would be awful for any attempt by either party to govern from 2014 to 2016; but what is two years of rudderless drift in a dangerous world when victory can be yours? It is not like Republicans really care about governance, especially when it's not their guy in the Oval Office.
Republicans only care about power, not about the day to day business of running a nation.

The only thing that may prevent this scenario is a blow-out reelection of Obama. I’m not talking about a Goldwater type debacle, but at least a 55%-45% split or better. A ten percentage point crushing of the Republican candidate (very likely to be Romney) could not be chalked up to voter fraud no matter how hard Fox and Freaks tries to pitch the propaganda. If Obama wins narrowly, mark the summer of 2014 for Republican Run for impeachment. If the Republicans fail to hold on to the House in 2012, the affair may be put off to Winter of 2014/5; Merry Christmas.

Granted I’ve been wrong in my predictions before. I thought that Newt Gingrich’s long history of sliminess would negate any mud tossed his way. I was wrong, voters noticed the new mud tossed by Romney against the background of all that old crusty muck Gingrich was already carting around; bummer. Still I have a good chance of being right this time. At the very least, I have the broken clock's chance. We will see, first Obama has to get reelected, and that is no sure thing in itself. Anything can happen in ten months time. Who knows, we might be all speaking Mandarin by then.

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Fracas In Florida

With the Florida primaries fast upon us both Willard Romney and Newton Leroy Gingrich all pulling out all the stops. The T.V. Ads are brutal. I pity the poor residents of the Sunshine state because both candidates are bringing on the gloom and doom.

Romney stopped hitting the snooze button and finally bashed the panic button for all its worth. Getting creamed in S.C. can do that to a Republican front-runner. With an new debate coach in hand, the Mighty Mormon came out swinging and rained down blows on the Baron of Bloat. By the end of the debate Newt was staggering around stage, and asking any passer-by if they got the license number of the Mack truck that just ran him over.

After that last debate, many a pundit was declaiming that Newt was “dead.” Such short memories this pundit class. Newt has all the staying power of Dracula in those late 60’s Hammer Film Productions staring Christopher Lee. Drive any amount of steaks into the vampire’s chest, it does no good; he keeps coming back.

God knows the good villagers of the Republican Party elite brought enough crosses, garlic, and enough wood to build a small mansion; all with the intent of making sure Count Newt went down, and stayed down. The powers that be even had Chris Christy attempt to sit on Gingrich, hoping the NJ governor’s shear heft would crush Newt . Still, who knows, it is really hard to kill Newt; because like Spock, he’s been dead before.

Newt died a very ugly political death in the 90’s. Having been played like a five dollar banjo by Bill Clinton, Newt was tossed out on spotted behind by his own Republican caucus. The Republicans had him dead to rights with a ethics violation, and the Democrats will more than willing to toast marshmallows on the flaming bier the House Republicans had built for Gingrich.

All through the late nineties, and the turn of the new millennium, Newt waited; biding his time. He got filthy rich via his “history lessons” to numerous clients, and waited for his main chance. The main chance came this year, when the next guy up for nomination was Mitt Romney. Mitt was so weak that Newt, who started campaigning as way to remind us of who he was (and sell books) became a legitimate possibility for office.

Let me rephrase that, Newt became “legitimate” because he was the last anti-Romney left standing. Santorum had his hiccup in Iowa, but only Newt had the real chance in S.C. Newt, knowing that S.C. Was do or die, dusted off every odd dog-whistle in his collection, and blew each and every one for maximum effect.

Which brings us back to Florida. It is desperation time for both Newt and Mr. Ice. If too cool for school Romney looses Florida, he is in real trouble. His coterie of Establishment  Republicans are going to bail; draft Jeb Bush anyone?A FL victory for Mr. Gingrich turns Mitt from Mr. Inevitable to the Anybody but Newt candidate. Mitt is not very convincing in that roll.

While Republicans are freaking out on the prospect of candidate Gingrich as their standard bearer, what should be their concern is the systemic rot that Newt represents. I am talking about more than just the odd corruption that pay-to-play brings to the table.  I am talking about a more profound rot, a cynical, corrupt, and lazy ideology fueled by hate and bitterness. It is a deeply selfish philosophy, resentful of any attempt to invoke a common cause, a common goal, or even common decency. It is all about my way or the highway, about the domination; the obliteration of anyone who does not look like you or agree with you.

Newt is the logically conclusion to a Republican orthodoxy that only fools, ideologues and cynics can support. Gingrich plugs into the resentful reptile brain of the Republican base. He pugs into the crypto racism, the sexual phobia, the misogyny, the immigrant bashing and patriarchy that are part and parcel of wingnut America. It is ugly stuff, no wonder the elites recoil at the sight of it.

Like it or not, Newton Leroy Gingrich is not the end of this ugliness. This is a systemic problem. Gingrich and the TEA Party are just the same old wine of resentment poured in a new bottle. Even if Gingrich ends in Florida, his legacy will continue. Sooner or later the monster the Republicans built deep in the heart of DIxie will claim its own.

You Knew This Was Coming.

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/updates/4821



The last time Herman Cain made a presidential endorsement, he backed “the people”, part of his promise to make an “unconventional endorsement” after ending his own campaign for president.
With days to go until the Jan. 31 Florida primary vote, however, Cain chose to make a more traditional endorsement speech. At a Republican event in Palm Beach, FL Saturday night, Cain put his weight behind Gingrich.
“I had it in my heart and mind a long time,” Cain said of his endorsement, appearing with Gingrich at a Republican fundraiser. “Speaker Gingrich is a patriot. Speaker Gingrich is not afraid of bold ideas.”
snip
Looks like Newt has the philandering husband demographic all sewn up now that the Herminator has given the former Speaker Of The House the nod.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Public sours on Romney in January - Behind the Numbers

The Washington Post

The number of Americans with negative views of Mitt Romney has spiked in a new Washington Post-ABC News poll, compounding the former Massachusetts governor’s challenges as he tries to rally from Saturday’s big loss in South Carolina.
Among independents, Romney’s unfavorable rating now tops 50 percent — albeit by a single point — a first in Post-ABC polling back to 2006. Just two weeks ago, more independents had favorable than unfavorable views of Romney; now, it’s 2 to 1 negative.
Snip

Not good Willard, not good at all.

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Newt Gingrich, The Distillation of The Modern Republican Party

The March to Mittdom, as Lee Papa calls it has been halted. What was always a dreary trudge toward the crowning of Willard Romney got ambushed in the swamps of South Carolina. It was not even close as the Magic Underwear Man got beaten like a rented mule. The base’s favorite amphibian got forty percent of the vote, while Willard returned to the pre-New Hampshire doldrums of one out of four.

One reason for the rise of Newt has to be that the clown circus of the debates were restarted. While Rick Perry gets a well earned rap for poor debate performances, Mitt is having issues in this area too. Mitt has played defense perfectly. No unforced errors, no oops from Mr. Ice. But, there is no passion, no red meat for the base either. What is worse, is that Mittens has had more than few deer in the headlight moments when his circuit boards shorted. The pander chip failed when Robo-Romney could not figure where to fling the unctuous nonsense. “How to play the voting ex-con talking point? Computer engage! Engage!! Must find the right talking point! Danger! Process failure ... illegal protocol ... reboot ... reboot!!”

Meanwhile, Newt was in his element. God how that sleazy, nasty, piece of work knows how to toss red meat to the Dixie base. If you can get over how god-awful the whole cynical process is, you can almost admire the shear, vicious brutality that Newt appeals to.  Man, he has that Reptile Brain of base dialed in and hard-wired for maximum effect. Be warned, were are about get deep, dark, and dirty on this subject.

Put on your hazmat suites and make sure all openings are taped up snug. Check your respirator seals for proper fit. Recheck those rubber gloves for pin-hole leaks gentle reader. We are about to wade in the toxic super-fund site that is the modern Republican Party for a look-see. We are visiting the very heart of darkness; make sure your papers are in order.

What was amazing about Newt’s South Carolina debate performance is how he performed an astounding act of political jujitsu. Face with the fury of a scorned wife, he was able to flip that charging beast without breaking a sweat. In less than five minutes he delivered master class in pure cynical political opportunism. A lesser politician would have had major difficulty if a former wife came at him with the type of scandal that Marianne Gingrich, wife number two, brought up from the depths of that failed marriage. But Newt hit that baby right out of the park. He shredded the moderator for even bring the subject up; which had the partisan crowd roaring with delight. After beating up the host, and by implication the entire Corporate Media, for their grubby, unwarranted attempt at Lese Majesty, Newton then pivoted for the extra bonus round of blatant misogyny.

If you can somehow deactivate your innate sense of moral outrage, you could then admire how well Gingrich played that crowd for the last gram of resentment and white male privilege. No one does the reprehensible, sleazy, cynical, politics of resentment quite like Newton Leroy Gingrich. It helped that Newt was fully engaged in a little bit of pay-back to Mittens, for the whack job Multiple Choice Mitt’s Super Pac did on Newt in Iowa, plus New Hampshire.

South Carolina was the perfect place for Newt to scuff up Mitt’s perfect hair. Newt knows these voters. He knows the dog whistles that brings them running. Like it or not, he is the real face of the Republican base in all its splendor.

Let me deconstruct that, let’s go a little deeper, into the very center of the toxic heart of the Modern Republican Party. Let’ go to the very radioactive center of the Elephant homeland. It begins and ends with two core items; the liberation (if poorly realized) of African Americans, and the liberation (again, if poorly realized) of women. More bluntly put, a lot of people are well and truly angered by the fact that both blacks and sex have slipped their chains. Ever since Nixon we have seen political blow-back, reaction, to civil rights and feminism.

This reaction is strongest in the south, in the beating heart of Dixie. In the rural, white, south, evangelicals went ballistic, and got political, when the sexual and civil rights revolutions blasted their little slice of heaven to smithereens. The twin pillars of Patriarchy and Privilege where shaken to their core; some one had to pay for that.

It was Richard Nixon, a master of the politics of resentment, that saw the opportunity. It was he who really got the southern strategy rolling. But lets be brutally honest. The south was not just Dixie. We are talking about not only a geographic idea, but a social reality.  Dixie extends far past the old Confederacy, deep into the fly-over states, with outliers as forward deployed as Orange County, California. Best described by the the trinity of guns, God, and guts, its anchors are a deep bigotry, and an even deeper patriarchy. Peel  back the patina provided by the AIE, the Heritage Foundation, the Hoover institute and other forms of wingnut welfare, and much Republican philosophy can be distilled to sticking it to the uppity blacks and the wonton sluts. The twin evils of the Republican mind set are femininity and non-white pigmentation; in no particular order.

Getting back to dark prince of dog-whistles, Newt. Mr. Gingrich knows how to really dive deep, dark and dirty into the fetid cesspools of bigotry and misogyny. He provided a master class in bigotry dog-whistles when he teed up against Juan Williams. That no one in that debate audience had any problem sucking down that radio-active bigotry that Newt was serving up; that they treated it like mana from heaven tells you much about the state of the Republican base in 2012. They loved it when the old, nasty white man put the uppity black guy in his place; God, how they cheered.

And as pointed out earlier, Newt also knows how to play the Misogyny card to perfection as well. It helps that the man is world class cad and male chauvinist pig. He has that contempt for women thing nailed down seven ways to Sunday. It is one of the few genuine bits of his inner being he allows to be seen. As this contempt nicely dove-tails with the base’s same feeling, it is not much of a problem for Newt--at least with right-wing Republicans. It is also not as much of a problem with woman voters as one suspects. As the anti-suffragettes, the Anita Bryant crowd, and the female supporters of Sara Palin prove, there is always a minority to a plurality of woman more than happy to keep the rest of the female gender in chains. Of course, outside the hermetically sealed confines of the TEA Party right, this level of misogyny is a bit of stretch.

But this missive is not about the supine left, or the muddled middle, it is about the rabid, reactionary right. The entire Republican Primary process, and especially the debate process, has made it crystal clear how deep down the Elephants have gone into the rabbit hole of reaction and resentment. The self-nominated partisans of the leading edge of the party have shown their colors at every opportunity in every audience in these debates. They are cruel, vicious, uncaring, mean --and proud of it. They are a cohort driven by their hatreds: their hatred for minorities, their hatred for the poor, their hatred for sex, their hatred for women, their hatred for secular society. Left behind by a modern society that no longer honors white, male privilege, nor its religiously fundamentalist underpinnings, their fondest wish is to reinstate the old order when theocracy was the order of the day. They would gladly reset the nation to not only before Griswold but to before Brown; reestablishing both Ozzy and Harriet conformity and Jim Crow. They want their lilly-white world back, and don’t give a damn who get hurts in the process.

This is why Newt will go deep and far in the Republican Primaries. He gets the resentment; hell the man has a few personal scores of his own to settle. His core nastiness, his bent and deeply soiled soul, is in simpatico with much of the Republican base. The man wants to get even, so does much of the Republican base. The base wants to fold modernity seven ways and do some very painful things with it to their fellow citizens. Gingrich is a little more focused, as he wants to do some very politically painful things to Romney; which is fine with the base because they despise the Mormon Robot almost as much as Newt does. Mittens is an silver-spoon, establishment Republican; and the rural, southern base hates those types of swells on general principle.

I honestly wonder if Romney chose the Republican Party out anything other than filial piety and the very special politics of Massachusetts. The man, quite frankly is a political dinosaur, one of the last of the species of Country Club Republicans who used to rule the political landscape of the North East Corridor.

Those creatures are slowly passing away, being replaced in their former habitat by blue-collar bruisers like Chris Christie. In the south, the Patrician Republicans never found a home, and were replaced by Bourbon Democrat turncoats, who kept their toxic politics while shifting labels. It is exactly the same economic royalists ruling the roost in Dixie, only the name has been changed to protect the guilty. There really is not a dimes worth of difference between the politics of Newton Leroy Gingrich and Lester Maddox. Scratch Gingrich and you still get the scent of sulfur that pervaded Maddox. That is the final bitter truth of the modern Republican Party, and perhaps its epitaph in 2012.

Friday, January 13, 2012

Newt goes nuclear.




Oh my stars and garters! I do believe that Newton is a bit piqued by what that cad Mr. Romney did to him in Iowa. Mercy me all this unpleasantness; it offends my sensibilities. I shall go to my garden, so I may be among beautiful things, and forget such unfortunate matters; be a dear and bring my usual to the gazebo.

Monday, January 2, 2012

The Adams Conundrum

“The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.

To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.

To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.”

― Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

I’ve been thinking of that quote for a while now, gentle reader. It does a fairly good job of distilling the central problem with the office of the President of the United States ever since Saint Ronny of Ray-Gun cleaned the old peanut farmer’s clock in 1980. It is hard to take a political process seriously when a grade B movie star, and professional political crank, manages to grab the brass ring.

But it has been even more depressing this election cycle because of the clown car primary process the Republicans have inflicted on a weary republic. I watch these proceedings with an ever rising sense of panic and melancholy. Is this really the best we can do as a nation? Is this really the top tier of political professionals? I would not trust this lot of politicians to run a McDonald’s, never mind the Hyper-power that is the USA.

Granted, it has been darkly humorous to watch the Conservative base swoon over one white knight after another; only to have them self-immolate before even doing battle with the hated dragon of Multiple Choice Mitt Romney. From Bachmann, to Perry, to Cain, to Gingrich, and now to Mr. Man-on-Dog-Sex Santorum, it has been an exercise in flail and fail. Each of these prospect proved beyond a shadow of doubt that they “should on no account be allowed to do the job.”  You would do better with a trained monkey.

Not that the Donkey Party is doing much better. They have their own issues to deal with, most under the heading of Barack Hussein Obama. The rank ambition of the man, linked with absolutely no moral compass, has been disastrous for the Democratic Party.  Obama’s “lets make a deal” transactional style of “leadership” has perverted everything the Party of FDR stood for.

The J’ accuse against the Obama lead, and feckless, Democratic Party is long and depressing. The “Progressive” wing of that party has been especially inept. Faced with a President who is essentially doing Richard Nixon in black-face, the Democrats in Congress have caved on every center-right talking point their leader has ever uttered. Spineless leaders, Pelosi in the House, Reid in the Senate, have followed the President in a Bataan Death March further and further to the right. Like their President they have followed the corporate money, and kowtowed to the wishes of the New Robber Barons. The special interests of big pharma, big business, and the Insurance Industry were coddled. The masses were toss the odd stale crumb to feast on, but only after reproductive health rights were trampled on by the usual gang of sex-phobes and religious reactionaries.

That even a stalwart leftist and self-proclaimed “Socialist” like Bernie Sanders begged off a legitimate challenge to Obama’s rightward lurch tells you everything you need to know about the Democratic Party. The Republicans are right; the Donkeys are, “surrender monkeys.” The Democrats keep folding to the power of the Corporations, to Wall Street, to the rich and connected, to their donors. They cannot even be bothered to go through the motions of fighting Corporate power.

Thus Obama gets to rest up and keep his powder dry, waiting for Mitt the inevitable to emerge from the toxic swamps of the Republican Primary process. Is anyone else having a severe case of acid reflux over this result? Is anyone else utterly disheartened that the final results of this process, which looks like two political hacks with no core beliefs fighting an epically dirty campaign from May to November? I know I don’t want to watch this unravel. I would rather dig my eyes out with rusty spoons.

Yet that is what we as a nation are up against. It is the end result of an utterly corrupt system melting down into absurdity.  Team Obama is shooting for a one billion dollar war chest. Romney will likely meet or exceed that amount. It is an open auction for the Unitary Executive, and you are not invited. In this bidding war, ordinary citizens do not have a prayer of having any influence.

And what of the contenders? What type of person is willing to whore themselves out for a billion dollar price tag? What type of person is willing to dial for dollars, to beg and wheedle for filthy lucre? What kind of promises, subtle or not, will they have to make? How is someone willing to grovel in such a shameless way qualified to hold any kind of office, never mind the Presidency?

Mark Twain once observed that history does not repeat itself, but it sometimes rhymes. I’m seeing that. I’m seeing a rhyme with the “Bearded Nonentities” of the late 19th Century. Starting with Bush Sr. It has been a sorry lot. None of the post Reagan Presidents rose above the low bar of mediocrity, and one fell far below it. We are living in a contradiction not seen often; an executive that has almost limitless powers institutionally, run by men who’s effective power is weak. Maybe it’s because they should never had gotten the job in first place. “[A]nyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.” Sad, but ever so true.

Sunday, January 1, 2012

The Google Will Never Be The Same


Santorum’s Last Stand 


Days before the Iowa caucus the senator shoots from the back of the pack.



DES MOINES, IOWA—Rick Santorum is so hot right now, you'd think he was the cure to something. When pollsters for the Des Moines Register started contacting Republican voters on Tuesday, Santorum was at 10 percent. By Friday when the polling ended, he was at 22 percent, tied for the lead. If they'd kept calling Saturday, voters might have answered the phone singing the senator's name.
When the days were averaged out, which pollsters do to smooth out anomalies, the findings put Romney at 24 percent, Ron Paul at 22 percent, and Santorum at 15 percent. Given the trend, it's possible Santorum could win the caucus on Tuesday, which would be a perfect ending to a volatile race.


Snip

Well, there is nothing for it. This small, humble blog must keep the mem going:

Santorum- The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.

Santorum- The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex

Santorum- The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.

Santorum- The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.

Santorum- The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.

We apologize, but truth and justice must be served.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Perry Doubles Down On The Misogyny


Rick Perry shifts abortion views: No exception for rape, incest

By James Oliphant | McClatchy-Tribune News Service James Oliphant

OSCEOLA, Iowa — Rick Perry, in the midst of a furious late-stage effort to finish strongly in next week's GOP Iowa caucuses, said at a town-hall-style campaign event here that his views on abortion have shifted and that he no longer believes the procedure is acceptable in any circumstances. Assuredly, the Texas governor has never been a moderate on the issue. But until recently, he had said an abortion might be justifiable in cases of rape or incest or if the mother's life was in danger. Tuesday, at the last leg of a four-stop bus trip across southwestern Iowa, Perry was asked a question by a local pastor about his abortion views, noting that the candidate had recently signed a pledge to oppose abortion in every situation and asking whether Perry had changed his mind. Perry replied that he had. "You're seeing a transformation," he said. Recently watching an anti-abortion film had persuaded him to alter his view, he said. The transformation, such as it is, comes at a particularly opportune time. With a week to go until the Jan. 3 caucuses, Perry is trying to court the social conservatives here who have yet to coalesce around a single candidate as they did for Mike Huckabee four years ago. And Perry has watched as Rick Santorum, an unyielding opponent of abortion rights, has picked up endorsements in the last week from key evangelical leaders in the state.

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/12/27/134237/perry-shifts-abortion-views-no.html

Monday, December 12, 2011

I'll betcha a trillion fabillion dollars...


Confession – I missed the most recent GOP debate between would-be nominees because I was at a hockey game (go Blues!).  But thanks to the magic of Twitter...I caught up on the who, what, when, and where.
Shall we?

Oh my stars and garters, Ms. Shark-Fu is in rare form gentle reader; rare form indeed!
The money quote "Choosy moms choose Jiff…
….and likely Republican voters prefer zealots, homophobes, and hypocritical lying sacks of shit."


Mercy me, I definitely want whatever coffee she is having when she "Pause[s]…sip[s] coffee…continue[s].


Sunday, December 11, 2011

Newt The Pander Bear


“Remember, there was no Palestine as a state. It was part of the Ottoman Empire" until the early 20th century,

"I think that we've had an invented Palestinian people who are in fact Arabs, and who were historically part of the Arab community.”

Thus did Newton Leroy Gingrich make a play to out-NeoCon Mitt Romney. This is an old talking point and it is one of the bigger fatter lies put out by the Likudniks in and out of Israel. It is the rationalization for the Idea of “Greater Israel,” the notion that Jewish state should encompass the entire portion of the former British Mandate of Palestine. It is a proposition that the theft of the West Bank and the Golan Heights is not theft at all since no “real” people are being disadvantaged. It is also a neat way to deny that the Nekba ever happened.

You can really take the measure of Newt by this statement. The overcompensated historian for Fannie Mae threw raw meat to the Greater Israel crowd in a cynical move to garner votes.

Give Newt his due, he really knows what is required in the game of “who is the greater friend of Israel. This was a speech that would have done the ultra-Likudnik, Arabophobe, and all around nasty piece of work Avigdor Lieberman proud. The speech by Gingrich was designed to send the AIPAC crowd in to paroxysms of rapture. 

While many see this speech as a gaff, I do not gentle reader. In a primary process designed and operated on the principle of telling people exactly what they want to hear, facts be damned, Newt captured the Israel Uber Alles zeitgeist of the Republican Party. This was no gaff, this was a calculated move to capture a critical element of the Republican base. While intellectuals on both the right and left side of the political divide were picking up their collective jaws from the floor, the AIPAC / CUFI crowd were dancing in the streets. Gingrich was telegraphing these movers and shakers that he was their guy. Note how Newt did not back down from the stance in the debate, even after Romney pinged him for it. No, Newt claimed to be “truth telling”

“"Is what I said factually correct? Yes. Is it historically true? Yes," he answered. "Are we in a situation where every day rockets are fired into Israel while the United States? The current administration tries to pressure the Israelis into a peace process... Somebody ought to have the courage to tell the truth. These people are terrorists. They teach terrorism in their schools. They have textbooks that say, if there are 13 Jews and nine Jews are killed, how many Jews are left? We pay for those textbooks through our aid money. It's fundamentally time for somebody to have the guts to stand up and say, enough lying about the Middle East."


Let’s unpack that quote, shall we? Not only are these people unreal, they are even more of the “other.” They are to a man, woman, and child, terrorists. Even the babies in diapers are part of this “terrorist” cell posing as a people.  That quote by Gingrich was toxic beyond belief, it turned an entire people into a band of sub-human monsters. It turned the Palestinians into demon-possessed hoards of zombie killers. Nicely played Newt, and bonus points for calling this calumny the “truth.”

But there will be no blow-back for Newt; no real down-side. This is the Republican Primaries gentle reader, and the lunatics have taken over the asylum. Romney and others might slap Gingrich’s wrist, but that is the extent of the punishment that will be doled out. The Elephants can not call out Newt on his bad behavior, because they too are in the game of “who is the best friend of Israel.”

This is how Mitt trimmed his sails:

"The last thing [Israeli Prime Minister] Bibi Netanyahu needs to have is not just a person who's a historian, but someone who is also running for president of the United States stand up and say things that create extraordinary tumult in... his neighborhood," Romney said. "And if I'm president of the United States, I will exercise sobriety, care, stability and make sure that I don't say anything like this. Anything I say that can affect a place with -- with rockets going in, with people dying. I don't do anything that would harm that -- that process. And, therefore, before I made a statement of that nature, I'd get on the phone to my friend, Bibi Netanyahu and say, would it help if I say this? What would you like me to do? Let's work together because we're partners. I'm not a bomb-thrower. Rhetorically or literally."

Again, let’s unpack that. Please note that absolutely nowhere does Multiple Choice Mitt ever call Gingrich out on his blatant bigotry. Notice the almost servile note Magic Underwear Man takes to Bibi: would this statement help, how can I help you, would you like a back rub? By his statements you think that Mitt was at the beck and call of Bibi Netanyahu, that the US was the client of Israel; not the other way around. 

It is  not like Israel is without resources. The last time the Palestinians got too frisky with rockets, Israel stomped all over the Gaza strip in something called “Operation Cast Lead” and then followed up with the siege of Gaza. Exactly what kind of “help” would Mitt be offering that could trump that one-two punch? Other than carpet bombing Gaza into oblivion, there is no way Mitt could match the savagery of Cast Lead and the Gaza blockade. 

Gingrich easily swatted Mitt aside by invoking the sacred shade of Reagan. By calling himself a “Reaganite,”  managed to short circuit any response by the other candidates. This worked more than others would suspect because Newt was in Congress during the Reagan era, making it much easier for him to cover himself in the mantle of the Gipper. It really does not matter that the claim was hilariously untrue, that it does not even have a passing acquaintance with reality. Reagan is the new JFK, everyone claims his legacy.

Newt understand the importance of blowing the Reagan dog whistle along what Taylor Marsh calls “ Middle East dog whistle stuff that matches his dream of John Bolton as his secretary of state.”  This is why Newt is making the most of his second look. He knows exactly what trips the triggers of the conservative faithful. Stay on the ideological message, and they will forgive a multitude of sins; about three wives plus a corrupt speakership’s worth. Taylor’s suspicion that “Establishment Republicans will be downing antacids like candy”  about the rise of Newt is most likely true; but they only have themselves to blame. 

Over the last thirty years they have allowed their party to drift further and further in to the la-la land of ideological purity. They have pandered to kooks. Now the kooks have found their man, the utterly cynical Gingrich. Gingrich understands like no other Republican what the base wants to hear. He also understands that looking past the primaries is a fool’s game. Capture the base, crush the competition, then worry about the general. To capture the base you have to be willing to truly embrace the crazy. You have to be willing to pander, and be believable. Newt is willing to pander, and pander in a way that is believable. He proved it by doubling down on his Palestinian comments. Republicans love that stuff; they love loud and wrong. While others see a gaff, your faithful corespondent sees only genius. It’s an evil genius, but genius none the less.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Is This Any Way To Run A Major Party?

The implosion of the latest non-Romney de jure, Herman Cain, was quite a spectacle. The rapid rise and equally rapid decent of the former Godfathers Pizza CEO was one of the more bizarre moments in a primary process rife with dadaist moments. Mr Cain was a hot mess, to put it mildly. But Pizza Guy was not alone. This whole sorry process began weird, stayed weird to the present, and looks to continue to be weird right into at least New Hampshire.

The first notice that lunatics had taken over the asylum was the flash in the pan that was Michelle Bachmann. She rose to prominence in the dog days of the Iowa summer. The Moron Media went ga-ga when Bachmann nabbed the utterly pointless straw poll of the 2011 Iowa State Fair. That poll has a history of being as predictive as a dart throw by a blind man in raging wind storm. But how the media flogged that story for all its worth. Bachmann became the putative front runner, queen for a day. Unfortunately for her, the reign as queen of the prom melted away on contact with the first debates. All her candidacy manage to do was fricassee the presidential aspirations of Mr. Excitement, Tim Pawlenty.

T-Paw's anemic showing in the Iowa beauty contest was pathetic beyond belief. The man polled slightly above flesh eating bacteria.  Bachmann was the cool kid on the block; at least until people started looking under the hood.  It was Bachmann who started the un-Romney merry-go-round spinning. She rose and fell, an August bloom that died with the first frost of September. She managed to do this without one single voter casting one single vote.

Next up was the manly man, and Texas stalwart, Rick Perry. Perry picked up most of the supporters that deserted Bachmann, and then added a few of his own. Perry was swimming in cash, always a good thing to have when running for high office, and had many rich supporters were ready, willing and able to add to the piggy bank. But then, like a old skipping vinyl record, the debates came round. To say Perry was not ready for the debates is like saying a man only clad in his underwear is not ready for a sword fight. Perry's utter lack of discipline, his epic affliction with foot-in-mouth disease, showed everyone who cared to notice what an utter dim-bulb the Texas governor was. There was only one debate where Perry did not manage to step on a huge rake of his own making. Republicans saw this and their hearts sunk. There was no way this man was going to survive a toe-to-toe with Barack Hussain Obama in the general. It would be like tossing a newborn kitten to a starving wolf.

Thus,  Perry was DOA from self-inflicted wounds, again without a single vote cast. The next lucky contestant was Herman Cain.  That Herman Cain was issued a ticket on the Republican turn-o-matic was a thing that should have given pause. The man had nothing, absolutely nothing to recommend him as the leader of the free world.  All Herman brought to the table was his own excessive self-regard. Any rational national party, performing even the slightest due diligence, would never had let a man like Herman Cain near the primary process. But the TEA Party lead Republicans are no longer a rational outfit; they are an ideological jihad. Only a Party wholly subsumed by an idea fixe could have let a man like Herman Cain become a front runner. His policy proposals barely made the grade as bumper-sticker material. As actual real world solutions they were laughably inadequate. Cain's belligerent ingnorance on matters great and small played well to the TEA Party faction, but would have been radioactive in the general election. Cain finally died an ugly political death when his trousers issue came to the fore-- he couldn't keep the damn things on. The coupe de morte was the revelation of a thirteen year off and on affair with an Atlanta businesswoman. Herman resigned the fray, and yes dear reader, without a single vote cast for him or anyone else.

So we now stand at the Yule season, winter is upon us. Right after the last of the New Year's egg nog is settling in our tummies, Iowa will have an actual vote on the matter of who is the next Republican nominee. But thanks to a process that would give the Marque de Sade pause for being too cruel, four candidates will no longer be in the running. This for a caucus that has a history of being non-representative, a bad indicator of who the final candidate for either party will be.

Is this any way to run a modern political party? The critical debates were watched by a pitiful number of voters. The polls that doomed Bachmann et. al. were an even smaller cross section of the voters. Yet thanks to all these machinations, real results have happend. Two candidates have bowed out, two more are just lying on the floor, waiting for the inevitable mercy killing. One candidate, a man left for dead only six months ago, has rocketed to the front. The other, is still plugging away, is still unloved by almost three quarters of his party's voters. What an ungodly mess.

If Obama does pull off a reelection victory, you can look to the present mess of the Republican Primary process for one clue why that happend. It's been a clown car from start to finish. Obama only has to remind the voters of what the Republican nominee said to get the nomination to scare off the independents for pulling the lever for the Elephant.

If Obama does obtain reelection, look to the Republicans to reform their process once again. Most likely 2016 will not see the freak show that was 2011-2012 debates. Or at least the debates will be held a lot later in the process. Political pundits and ink stained journalist will have to go back to the typical summer fair of fluff and nonsense. Come to think of it, that was the  2011national Republican primary process in a nut shell.